Was there no innovation in Obama election pages?
Alan Jacobson over at Brass Tacks Design has an interesting essay today that posits this point: News design needs to evolve.
In an essay (headlined “Designers should heed these lessons from Obama”) that runs next to the recently relaunched Best Front Design, Jacobson speaks smartly about what he saw as an ordinary approach in too much of the design of too many newspapers on Nov. 5, the day after the election.
“Unlike Obama, these page designs didn’t break any ground,” Jacobson writes.
Jacobson makes a convincing argument, using Media News chief Dean Singleton as an example but clearly extrapolating across the industry, that news design has reached a level of competency that, while good, is not breaking any new ground. And that if it continues on its current path, design jobs will be lost to offshoring, consolidation, or both.
The peril as he he describes it is real, especially as every news organization in the country examines resources.
“The issue is whether American newspaper designers will keep their jobs in the face of the next round of staff cuts. To do so, they’ll need to demonstrate more creativity than they did on Nov. 5 – the kind of creativity that sells the paper, improves the website and makes both of them effective environments for advertising, even on days when no history is made,” Jacobson writes.
You can argue about whether one paper or another might have done something extraordinary in print on Nov. 5, but the question for today is whether and where there can be innovation in news design? Discuss.